(003)
By Reni Sentana-Ries, June 28, 2013
The word "human" is made up of its original meaning as being
HU-man,
H=Holy and
U=Universal, thus
HUman. This tells us that our sacred
obligation for being "human" is to
display character attributes not standing in violation of the attribute of
ourselves being "human."
On this planet we however observe many people conducting themselves
outside of the two before-mentioned
attributes: that of being "holy" and "universal."
The reason for many not reflecting that obligation lies in
a) religious indoctrination and
b) philosophical indoctrination.
If both are not in alignment with the universal standard of being "holy" (pure)
and "universal" (applicable everywhere), then
the negative indoctrination of the mind
manifests behaviour patterns which are socially unacceptable, and which then
lead us to assess them in accordance with the non-acceptability of their
actions, and withdraw from them, or become cautious of them.
I think for self-preservation reasons we need to do that, don't you think? I am
not saying it is okay to tarnish everyone with the same brush, for
I don't believe in "collective guilt,"
but what I am saying here is that by virtue of some people conducting
themselves in such a severely socially unacceptable manner, that we must deny
them the right to call themselves "human,"
for that is something they will never do
for themselves, regardless to what extent their conduct is - simply speaking -
diabolical.